Conflict · Taliban marriage code
Taliban Decree: Silence Now Counts as Consent for Marriage
A 31-article Taliban marriage code treats a virgin's silence as consent and traps girls in marriages they never affirmatively chose.
Transcript · loading player
Close to 100. That is the number that matters most, because it is how Equality Now counts the edicts, decrees and directives the Taliban's de facto authorities have issued against women and girls in five years back in power 8. Read it slowly and its scale becomes physical: a new restriction roughly every two and a half weeks for five years, touching voice, movement, school, work, dress and now marriage itself. The anniversaries that fell on August 14-15, 2026, five years after the Taliban regained power on August 15, 2021, were marked not as a pause but as an inventory, with the BBC and Equality Now publishing retrospectives on lives described as unrecognisable 3810. Decree No. 18 is only the latest entry, and in many ways the most intimate.
In early May 2026, the Ministry of Justice quietly published Decree No. 18, officially the "Code on Judicial Separation of Spouses," a 31-article legal code governing marriage and judicial separation 9. It did not arrive with a press conference or an official English translation. It arrived as bureaucratic text, and its meaning had to be pieced together by translators, analysts and reporters in the weeks that followed. What drew immediate attention was a single rule of consent: a virgin girl's silence can be treated as consent to marriage 569. The Times of India reported the provision verbatim as: "Silence of virgin girl can be treated as consent" 6. A follow-up summarized the backlash in four words: "Virgin's silence is consent" 11. PolicyEast confirms both the decree's title and the silence-as-consent provision, noting critics say it erodes women's legal autonomy by not requiring explicit agreement 7.
The code does more than lower the bar for saying yes. According to the analysis published by MEMRI on May 29, 2026, it upholds Shari'a law allowing marriage of pre-pubescent girls, seeks to prevent dissolution of a marriage if a girl was married off by her father or grandfather, and permits dissolution only if she was married off by a "wali" (guardian) 5. In plain language, that is a hierarchy of male authority written into family law. A father or grandfather's decision is treated as close to final. Only a more distant guardian's decision leaves a clearer door open to a court. For girls married very young, before they could understand or contest what was happening, the law as analyzed offers almost no backward path to undo it.
The United Nations saw the danger early. On Thursday, May 21, 2026, the UN expressed "grave concern" that the new law on separation in marriage includes provisions on child marriage 2. The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan issued a statement that week raising the same alarm 9. The language was diplomatic, but the sequence mattered. Within weeks of quiet publication came international recognition that this was not a technical reform of divorce procedure. It was a substantive change to when a girl can be considered to have agreed to be a wife, and how hard it will be for her to stop being one.
I don't know how to save my daughter from her husband
By late June, that abstraction had names and houses attached to it. The Guardian on June 23, 2026 documented women with "almost no independent right to end a marriage," quoting a mother who said: "I don't know how to save my daughter from her husband" 4. The paper's reporting found families watching abuse continue because the new marriage law had closed the exits they once might have used 4. NBC, in its anniversary reporting, described the broader rollback as formalized in a penal code that experts say makes it almost impossible for women to escape abuse 10. Taken together, the two findings describe a legal pincer: consent made easier to presume at the start, separation made harder to obtain at the end.
Five years of narrowing choices
That pincer did not appear from nowhere. The decree extends a five-year ratchet of restrictions that includes face-covering requirements and bans on most workplaces and universities, with girls barred from public secondary schools 38. Equality Now's five-year assessment lists the scope from bans on women's voices in public to sharply limited education and work, and crucially, no minimum age for marriage 8. There is no line in the sources provided that sets a protective floor under Decree No. 18. MEMRI describes "pre-pubescent" girls but gives no codified age, and no source here provides the full official text, an official Taliban translation, or the decree's precise age thresholds 2567. The absence of a minimum age is itself the point critics keep returning to: without it, silence can cover childhood.
This is why the legal mechanics deserve close attention rather than dismissal as cultural difference. Requiring no explicit agreement shifts the burden of refusal onto the person with the least power in the room. A girl who does not speak, who does not understand, who is frightened, who has been told not to shame her family, is recorded by the logic of the provision as agreeing. And if her marriage was arranged by her father or grandfather, the MEMRI reading says the code seeks to prevent dissolution 5. PolicyEast's summary is blunter in effect: without explicit agreement, legal autonomy erodes 7. For outside readers accustomed to marriage as a contract requiring an affirmative yes, the inversion is the story. Silence, which in most legal systems means nothing, is made to mean everything.
There is also what we do not know, and it is substantial. No source in this file provides the full official text of Decree No. 18, an official Taliban translation, the decree's enforcement mechanisms, or prevalence data on child marriage since its issuance 2567. Any verbatim official Taliban response defending the law is absent from all provided sources 2567. That gap should be flagged, not filled. It means we cannot yet say how judges and local officials are instructed to apply the silence rule, what penalties or procedures surround it, how often it has been invoked, or how the authorities answer the charge that it legalizes child marriage. The human costs suggested by early reporting are real, but their precise scale is still to be measured.
Known
- Decree No. 18's most disputed rule treats a virgin girl's silence as consent to marriage. 569
- The code as analyzed upholds marriage of pre-pubescent girls and favors marriages arranged by father or grandfather against dissolution. 5
- The UN expressed "grave concern" on May 21, 2026 about child-marriage provisions. 29
- Families report being unable to end abusive marriages under the new law. 4
- Equality Now counts close to 100 restrictive edicts in five years, with no minimum age for marriage. 8
Unknown
- No public full text, official translation, codified age threshold, or enforcement guidance has been verified.
- No reliable prevalence data shows how child marriage has changed since early May 2026.
Next
- Whether courts will publish procedures showing how silence is recorded and challenged.
- Whether trapped families find any legal path out, and whether international pressure alters enforcement.
Terms
- Decree No. 18
- The 31-article "Code on Judicial Separation of Spouses" published in early May 2026 governing marriage and separation.
- wali
- Guardian under the code's framework; MEMRI analysis distinguishes a father or grandfather from a wali for dissolution rights.
- UNAMA
- UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, which joined the UN expression of grave concern in May 2026.
- Shari'a
- Islamic law as invoked by the code to uphold marriage of pre-pubescent girls, per MEMRI analysis.
Sources
- Taliban Decree: Silence Now Counts as Consent for Marriage
- UN gravely concerned by an Afghan Taliban law that has provisions on child marriage
- Afghan women tell the BBC their lives are unrecognisable after five years of Taliban rule
- ‘I don’t know how to save my daughter from her husband’: the brutal reality of the Taliban’s new marriage law | Women's rights and gender equality | The Guardian
- Afghan Taliban's 'Code On Judicial Separation Of Spouses' Upholds Shari'a Law Allowing Marriage Of Pre-Pubescent Girls, Seeks To Prevent Dissolution Of Marriage If Married Off By Father Or Grandfather, Permits Dissolution Only If Married Off By 'Wali [Guardian]' | MEMRI
- Afghanistan Child Marriage: 'Silence of virgin girl can be treated as consent': Taliban formally recognises child marriage with special rules in Afghanistan - The Times of India
- Afghanistan's Decree No. 18 and Women's Rights - PolicyEast
- 5 years of Taliban rule: Generations of progress erased for women and girls - Equality Now
- Codifying Control: Taliban’s Anti-Women Decrees - Afghan Studies Center
- In Afghanistan, the Taliban have a powerful new tool in their quest for total social control
- Taliban Child Marriage Laws: Virgin's silence is consent: Taliban faces backlash for 'legitimising' new child marriage laws in Afghanistan - The Times of India
Revision log
- r1First published.